|
Post by garybechtold on Nov 20, 2014 0:41:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Green68Camaro on Nov 20, 2014 10:22:12 GMT -5
The front end has a mean look to it. I like it.
|
|
|
Post by 65stang on Nov 20, 2014 21:49:34 GMT -5
As a Mustang enthusiast it is hard to say, but I am not a fan in the least.
|
|
|
Post by garybechtold on Nov 22, 2014 20:31:11 GMT -5
Well I think the new Mustang has the potential to be an awesome modern muscle car. 500+hp from a 5.2L V8 that revs? No turbos or supercharging? I think that is amazing. I think the Shelby looks bad-ass! It's going to be neat to see what Chevy does for the next Camaro.
|
|
|
Post by Green68Camaro on Nov 22, 2014 23:01:26 GMT -5
I hope it is better than the last flop in styles. If you do not own a classic Camaro you like the new style, but if you own a Classic you do not like the new ones. It might go for Mustangs also.
|
|
|
Post by garybechtold on Nov 23, 2014 1:19:26 GMT -5
I agree. I'm not necessarily a fan of the new generation Camaros, particularily in "regular" SS or RS models. The classics do have a certain style that cannot be repeated. I do like the performance of the special models like the Z/28 or ZL1. The ZL1 also to me fixed alot of the visual flaws I saw on the "regular" models.
|
|
|
Post by 65stang on Nov 23, 2014 19:21:22 GMT -5
The thing is, the performance numbers don't matter to me, if the car is not appealing. I've seen a new one in person.
|
|
|
Post by garybechtold on Nov 23, 2014 22:16:09 GMT -5
This looks better to me in pictures than the regular GT. I've seen the new ones also and I agree it's not the most exciting car. Actually the numbers don't matter as much to me also, the thing sounds awesome.
|
|
|
Post by T-Man on Nov 24, 2014 22:53:36 GMT -5
Looks like the lovechild between a Toyota Celica and a Ford Fusion with a HellCat for an uncle. It's the future....crap.....I mean "cool"
|
|
|
Post by 65stang on Nov 26, 2014 10:33:45 GMT -5
As an avid Mustang enthusiast, I hate to post this picture. It is honestly pretty close to what I think of the new model. It may sound cool and it may actually be a nice car, but that's not enough for me.
|
|
|
Post by 65stang on Nov 26, 2014 10:37:58 GMT -5
The only reason I liked the 2005-2009, was because it actually looks like a Mustang.
|
|
|
Post by garybechtold on Nov 26, 2014 10:57:47 GMT -5
I don't really see it. Much tighter lines on the Mustang.
|
|
|
Post by 96pushrodford on Nov 26, 2014 14:03:28 GMT -5
Needs More Plastic
|
|
|
Post by 65stang on Nov 27, 2014 15:53:16 GMT -5
To me its just like those Pontiac GTOs from a few years back that are basically a Grand Am GT with a fun drivetrain. Its just a boring design, and the front end is hideous. The Mustang does look better than the Honda, but not enough.
|
|
|
Post by Green68Camaro on Dec 4, 2014 14:33:32 GMT -5
I guess since Mustang could not beat them they decided to make theirs look like the Honda. At least the Mustang is not as bad looking as the Camaro.
|
|
|
Post by 65stang on Dec 4, 2014 20:54:50 GMT -5
I think you may be right about that Joe.
|
|
|
Post by garybechtold on Jun 2, 2015 22:26:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by garybechtold on Jul 31, 2015 10:05:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by v8vega on Aug 1, 2015 9:06:37 GMT -5
I am absolutely an old car enthusiast. But, the technology going into these new cars is absolutely amazing. I lived through the late 70's and 80's when we were convinced performance was dead. These new cars with their horsepower numbers, handling, and all the comforts of home to boot seems crazy. Looks are a personal preference. But you can't argue with the performance side of it.
|
|
|
Post by softwarejanitor on Aug 3, 2015 10:31:44 GMT -5
The nose looks like a catfish. I've never been a fan of Ford or Mustang styling although I'd take one over most imports...
|
|